I get asked many questions dealing with the health
related issues of gaining. For example,
most recently a gainer reported the “dreaded”
discussion his family has had with him over his “expansion.” This sort of
well-meaning “intervention” is usually based on the “sound bites” of how most
people receive the news, and these days the 3 minute TV version
The “truth” is often more complicated than dividing
things into “Bad/Good” categories. Science has come to understand human fat as
being another type of organ that is extremely active within the body and it
produces its own set of hormones. Perhaps most importantly is a growing
realization of how much humans can vary in how they deal with weight gain (or
weight loss) in their very individual ways. By the way, if fat reduction
automatically resulted in greater health, then we would see that those who had
their fat
cells “sucked out” (surgically removed through various types of
liposuction) would improve their health. But this isn’t what we see in actual
research. Physical reduction of body fat doesn’t grant better health to those
who have had liposuction.
A new study has been released that shows in specific
cases—getting fatter can actually make you healthier. It’s just part of a
growing (pun intended) body of research that shows how complex fat can be.
Here are the details and you can find the original
source here: http://blogs.plos.org/obesitypanacea/2014/05/26/scienceoffat/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+plos%2Fblogs%2Fobesitypanacea+%28Blogs+-+Obesity+Panacea%29
A new study in obese mice suggests that
increasing the growth of fat located under the skin (subcutaneous) actually led
to an improvement in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, both precursors
to diabetes. The expansion of subcutaneous fat was also associated with a
reduction in the fat stored in places that aren’t meant to store fat, such as
the liver.
The study, published online at the journal Obesity, induced the
growth of subcutaneous fat through hyperplasia (increasing the number of fat
cells) rather than hypertrophy (growth of existing fat cells) by injecting
“acellular adipogenic cocktails” around the subcutaneous fat depots in obese
mice. Ten weeks post-injection, the mice showed evidence of subcutaneous fat
expansion and the corresponding metabolic improvements described above.
So,
just to recap: obese mice became healthier by getting fatter.
Should we be surprised? Not if you’ve been following our blog
over the years.
Let’s do a quick review.
First, it is important to understand that fat, or adipose
tissue, which is mostly composed of many individual fat cells (adipocytes) is
not inherently unhealthy. To the contrary, adipose tissue is absolutely
necessary to allow the body to store excess calories during times when we
ingest more calories than we expend through activity and resting metabolism. By
doing so, adipose tissue acts as a buffer of excess calories, and thus protects
other tissues of the body from accumulating fat (i.e. heart, liver, muscle).
This notion is best represented by the fact that individuals who completely
lack fat tissue (a disorder known as congential lipodystrophy) are very
unhealthy and are almost guaranteed to develop diabetes and heart disease,
despite having an athletic and lean appearance.
In other words, fat tissue is essential for health.
Where many people get into trouble is when they have exhausted
their body’s ability to store more calories in adipose tissue – we all have a
certain threshold to which our fat depots can expand. When we get to that
point, our fat cells become so big that they are no longer able to buffer
excess calories and thus cannot protect other tissues from fat accumulation and
damage. This is when many of the classical metabolic problems of obesity become
apparent – increased blood fats, blood glucose levels, etc.
But
wait, isn’t losing fat through diet and exercise good for health?
Yes, when we expend more energy (exercise) or reduce the amount
of food we ingest (diet), or both, our body draws on our extra stores of energy
in our adipose tissue – this process gradually reduces the size of the
individual fat cells. That is, fat loss occurs due to a reduction in size of
fat cells, not a reduction in the number of fat cells. Not surprisingly, your
pants start fitting better. Also, this process makes fat cells more efficient
at sucking up excess calories the next time we again eat more than we expend.
What
about liposuction?
Fat loss through diet/exercise is completely different from the
scenario of liposuction, where a whole bunch of fat cells are removed from the
body – that is, you reduce the number of fat cells, but the remaining ones
don’t get any smaller or healthier. In fact, the opposite may be true, with
less place to store excess calories than before surgery, so enlargement of
those fat cells left behind.
In a 2004 study, obese women who underwent abdominal
liposuction, losing approximately 30- 45 % of the subcutaneous fat in the
abdominal region (~10kg of fat), did not show improvements in any of the
metabolic markers assessed, including insulin sensitivity, blood pressure,
blood glucose, insulin, or lipid levels.
Just to recap: simply surgically removing subcutaneous fat
tissue does not make one healthier.
How
about increasing subcutaneous fat stores in obese people? Do they also become
healthier like the fat-gaining obese mice?
In a prior study, 12 overweight or obese and metabolically unhealthy
subjects were given a drug (Pioglitazone) for a duration of 12 weeks.
Pioglitazone belongs to the thiazolidinediones (TZD) class of drugs that seem
to upregulate the production of healthy new fat cells (a process known as
adipogenesis) – that is they make you fatter. By doing so, these drugs increase
the storage capacity of your fat tissue – something that is limited in
unhealthy obese individuals.
And that is precisely what happened in these subjects following
3 months of pioglitizone administration. First, they gained about 2kg of body
weight. Their amount of subcutaneous fat in the belly went up by about 10% and
that in their butt/thigh by about 24%. Interestingly, their amount of dangerous
visceral fat decreased by about 11%.
Also, a fat biopsy from the belly of the subjects showed that
the increase in fat mass was due to an increase in the number of small and
healthy adipocytes (hyperplasia – just like in the mice study) which are better
able to take up more circulating fat.
And what happened to their insulin sensitivity?
It improved by over 28%!
That’s right – they got fatter and yet healthier. Just like the
mice.
As we have attempted to highlight over the years, fat is not
inherently unhealthy. Losing fat isn’t always beneficial nor is gaining it always
detrimental to health. Matters related to excess fat and health risk are much
more nuanced than previously thought.
Peter
References:
1. Qiqi Lu et al. Induction of adipocyte hyperplasia in subcutaneous fat depot alleviated type 2 diabetes symptoms in obese mice. Obesity. 2014
2. Klein S. et al. (2004). Absence of an Effect of Liposuction on Insulin Action and Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 2549-2557
3. McLaughlin, T et al. (2009). Pioglitazone Increases the Proportion of Small Cells in Human Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue. Obesity.
1. Qiqi Lu et al. Induction of adipocyte hyperplasia in subcutaneous fat depot alleviated type 2 diabetes symptoms in obese mice. Obesity. 2014
2. Klein S. et al. (2004). Absence of an Effect of Liposuction on Insulin Action and Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 2549-2557
3. McLaughlin, T et al. (2009). Pioglitazone Increases the Proportion of Small Cells in Human Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue. Obesity.