Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Feederism History 101

Hello professor, as always your blog is a nice place where I can refresh my mind and learn about this community  now I'm bringing you another question more about our community by itself than me individually.

I know that the taste and admiration for the fat has been around since ancient times,and even if today our community still continues to grow, it has only recently begun to exist as such, then, although there has always been a taste for fat people and gaining weight (which may be  evidenced by history)the gainer community as we know it has a recent onset (or at least I guess), so when do you might consider the birth of the community itself?, when do we stopped just being a few people to form a real community?.

As you can see I'm interested about the community story, but well there is not much info about it!, so I hope you would help me a bit. Thanks for reading and keep doing your best as always who is really appreciated.
Truly yours:

H.

************************

Dear H,

It's very true fat admiration (in men as well as women) has been part of various human cultures throughout history, and it's probably more significant to ask why American and Western European cultures suddenly “switched” from appreciation of well fed people to feel as if “fat/bad” and “thin/good.”

Some believe it's related to the economy, where for most of human history, being larger meant you were more successful, and being big meant you had access to the resources to give you those curves. This was true across the world, and historically, among the Polynesian People, for example, nobility was expected to be very big, and some African traditional people had “fattening” ceremonies because a large man or woman fit their ideal of beauty.

Biologically speaking, the higher the body fat percentage of a female, the sooner she enters puberty, which is why in the United States, for example, we're seeing girls as young as ten years of age starting puberty. On the other hand, in communities where food is scarce and females have a very low body fat percentage, their puberty is “arrested” and won't happen until their late teens. We also see in certain female athletes (say long distance runners or competitive bodybuilders), when they maintain a body fat percentage under 7%, their menstrual cycles are irregular, and they will have a problem becoming pregnant. Just so, there is most likely a evolutionary imperative to have more fat than less.

Part of the current emphasis on being thin may be directly tied to the “Youth Culture,” where a great deal of money and medical science will focus on how to keep someone looking as young as possible for as long as possible, and being thin or lean is associated with being an adolescent or young adult. Also, especially in the United States, poor people tend to have a higher rate of obesity, so now many people associate fat with being poor, and lean with being rich enough to afford a personal trainer and chef.

When I was teaching at the Kinsey Institute, there was a very interesting collection of erotic art in many different forms, and the art from the late 1800s and before that will often show very rounded women, and men who definitely don't look like men you'd see on the cover of today's fitness magazines. 

First of all, people may have an interest in a particular “kink,” but historically will have a problem connecting with others who have a similar “kink,” particularly if it has a stigma attached to it. Also, up until around World War 2, at least in the United States, most people stayed in the area where they were born. That also limited exposure to others who might share the “kink,” or their sexual orientation. A popular British comedian has a routine about being “the only gay in the village.”

But by the mid-1940s-early 1950s, we see a major population shift from rural (agricultural) communities to urban (manufacturing) ones. Because of the War, a young man who might have never traveled 20 miles away from his home town in rural America, surrounded by corn fields, enters the army, get sent to a training center and was then shipped out to a war zone.

For many military men, their first sexual experience was either with another male in his platoon, for example, or with a prostitute (female or male) in a foreign port of call when they had some time off. When the War was over, many of these men returned to the United States, but didn't go “home,” but often stayed in the cities where they received training or shipped out. This might be, for example, San Francisco, San Diego, or New York City. These cities (and others) often became the birth sites of gay communities. It's a little more complicated, where, particularly in San Francisco, it was rather “wild” in the 1800s because of men on their own participating in the Gold Rush, and many “boom towns” immediately set up houses of prostitution because men wanted sex, they had money, and at the time, there was little law enforcement  The bottom line—you end up with what we call a “perfect storm,” of horny men, little supervision, and ample opportunity for sexual exploration.

If you were in your little hometown where everyone knows everyone else, you always know someone is watching you and people will gossip about you. But large cities mean you can be anonymous. For many, they won't even know the names of their closest neighbors. This encouraged gay communities (and neighborhoods) at a time when being gay was illegal.


How did people find each other? Gay bars, bathhouses, and what later became known as “personal ads.” As printing costs went down, people also used newsletters and self-printed magazines to make contact with others. In some cases, these were simple xerox copied (or mimeographs—a sort of very cheap printer) “magazines.”

In 1969, an organization was formed for the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (NAAFA), which wasn't intended to deal with “fat kinks,” but that was an unintended consequence. A special interest group split off focusing on what later became known as BBW (Big Beautiful Women) and a number of magazines featuring them were published that would often be found in “Adult Book Stores.” 

Similar magazines (and again, many of these began as very amateur (which, btw, the original meaning of “amateur” has the root word of “love,” so while now it often has a derogatory meaning, it used to mean someone was doing something because he or she loved doing it, and not because it was an occupation.) featuring fat men also started being published to meet the needs of gay and bisexual men. There were also specialized gainer newsletters, most coming out in the 1980s. One of the first “slick” or “high gloss” magazines (these are “trade terms that refer to the paper stock used on the cover, where it costs more and looked like professional magazines you'd see, like say, Cosmopolitan or GQ these days. That was Bear magazine,and it was first published in 1987.

Remember, this was before the Internet was easily accessible to the general population. Organizations formed like Girth and Mirth Clubs in the 1970s that brought together large men and their admirers. Organizations like this started in other countries as well, and there are regular conferences, where such clubs or organizations meet together. One of these is called “Convergence” and the 2013 event will be in New Orleans: http://www.convergence2013.com/event/seminars.aspx

When the Internet became more popular, people interested in various “kinks” found each other through “newsgroups” designated as “alt.sex.” There were also something in those days called “Message Boards” that allowed people to connect via the Internet, but that was to really provide telephone contact between those with similar interest. One of the first specifically for gay gainers, for example, was the “Waka Waka” message board in Seattle, Washington. 

As the Internet became even more accessible, several sites “evolved” from the alt.sex groups into some sites that are no longer available (such as Gainerweb, or Gainrweb), and those like Bellybuilders.com, and BiggerCity.com, that are still very active. These begat newer ones, such as Beefyfrat.com, and now Grommr and Grommr's new “sibling site” with more of an emphasis on chasers as well as “the chased.”

Parallel to this have been sites primarily focused on BBW, which have in some cases, as with Fantasyfeeder.com, become more gay/bisexual friendly. Just in terms of sheer numbers, because there are more straight men than gay ones, BBW sites may be more financially supported because there are more straight men looking for women than there are gay men looking for other men.

And finally, this is also something I feel important to history. Remember we see that one of the first “professional” magazines for men who liked their men big—was Bear magazine in 1987. Do you know what else was a focus of the gay community at that time? AIDS. Do you know what AIDS was often called in Africa? “The Skinny Disease.” One characteristic of the disease was “wasting syndrome,” where back in the days before our current medical treatments changed HIV from a terminal disease to a “manageable one,” the way, say diabetes, is a “chronic and manageable  disease," it was easy to walk down the street in San Francisco and immediately identify someone who had AIDS, at least in the later stages.

This led to a (false, btw) assumption that if you weren't skinny, you didn't have HIV. This coincides with the “growth” of the Bear culture, which while not the same as the gaining community, obviously has a lot of overlap. One of the treatments for AIDS at that time was a doctor prescribing steroids to prevent the loss of muscle mass.

As a result, you can see two responses to “The Skinny Disease”: being fat (in those days, doctors would recommend to their “normal” sized patients to gain at least 15 or more pounds while they had no symptoms, because when they did get sick, their body would have more resources to “fight off” the opportunistic diseases that came with AIDS. In other words, guys who had been told by the gay culture at the time “We value someone with a 29 inch waist,” were told by their doctors, “A 29 inch waist means if you do get sick, you'll be more likely to die than if you are carrying extra weight.” Many of the AIDS related publications and brochures at that time actually carried recipes to help patients get fat(ter).

The other response was to get muscular, and many men who had never been really muscular, found that the steroids they had been prescribed allowed them to obtain bodies that, well, could only usually be obtained from the use of steroids.

On a related topic, if you look back at gay related ads as well as in straight publications before the 1980s, the “desired” image of a male was not a guy who spent time in the gym at all, but was fairly lean. Here are two men from 1960s ad, and one from the movie “Making Of A Male Model” from the 1970s.
After Stonewall, the early 1970s image of gay men switched from a focus on very thin and somewhat femme men to a much more stereotypical “masculine” one, often inspired by the artist, Tom of Finland, so you get what was derogatorily called the “gay clone” that usually included a large mustache and a sort of lumberjack look or like the Leatherman, from a popular gay music group known as the Village People. The steroid treatments allowed a lot of AIDS patients to achieve this look, at least for a certain amount of time.

A lot of the men you and many others admire, often reflect these “unusual roots” of the rebellion against the “femme” stereotypes before Stonewall and gay rights, by the embracing of a more hairy/”masculine” look, and an attempt to avoid looking like you had “The Skinny Disease” by carrying extra weight, or striving for a very muscular body.

And that brings us up to current times, where obesity rates are increasing across the population groups, gay or straight. That makes a bigger belly more of a "norm," where a lot  of people don't necessarily feel as much pressure to strive for the old 29 inch waist.  The Internet can instantly connect people with similar interests on a global level. For example, in the 1950s, you would have to work very hard to find someone with an erotic interest in gaining—such folks were out there—but they would be difficult to locate, especially if you lived in a rural (and homophobic) area. These days, I enter “Chubby Chaser” into Google, and in .19 seconds, I have 795,000 hits. You can locate guys who don't want to gain, but just want to bloat, or people who are “just” encouragers  or are specifically “chubs for chubs.” Again—it wasn't that people with these interests didn't exist before you were born. But we now live in a world where individuals with a specific kink are much easier to find. And finally, the Internet provides a certain level of “protection,” where if you find someone with a matching kink, and they end up not being someone you find of interest outside of the kink—another person is just a click away. Gay bars, by the way, are now declining in numbers because while in the “old days,” they were basically “community centers” and a safe place for gay and bisexual men to meet—many younger men have never even been to a gay bar, because the Internet, or a Grommr meet satisfies their needs.

And they all lived happily ever after. (Which is how I think most histories should end.)









Monday, July 1, 2013

Hot Summer--Hotter Erotica sale (and a free gainer fiction for all visitors to my blog)

OK--as many of you know, I also write erotica and adult romance under my pen name of Skye Eagleday.  I am also one of the only people in the field who publishes professionally about well bellied guys and gaining, although a lot of people write about BBW (including me--BBW titles are among my best sellers, especially if a cowboy or a werewolf or two are involved). My other two gainer titles are Ballet Belly Bottom 2, and Fat Cupid's Mocha Latte.  I've put all three stories into a collection called Belly Up! A Collection of Chubby Chaser Sex, which can be found on B&N: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/chubby-chaser-sex-belly-up-skye-eagleday/1115426387?ean=2940015947687&isbn=2940015947687

To celebrate the 4th of July holiday, a group of us have banded together to offer a special event--Hot Summer--Hotter Erotica.  Authors have put a number of their works on sale at $.99 until the 5th of July, at which point the books will go back to full price.  I'm also throwing in a coupon you can use to get a free copy of one of my favorite ebooks--Ballet Belly Bottom.  Here's the info you'll need and it will be good until August 1, 2013: Coupon Code: BB29P
Expires: August 1, 2013  (The code is not case sensitive.) Here's the link to the ebook where you can use the coupon: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/272532


Meanwhile, here's the information about the Hot Summer--Hotter Erotica Event:

Hot Summer, Hotter Erotica Sale PLUS Giveaway!

July 1, 2013

Want some steamy erotica and the chance to win a $50 Amazon gift card?

We have some of the best erotica authors offering their stories for no more than 99 cents. Take a look at our sales below and pick up any of the sexy stories that take your fancy. If you'd like to help us spread the word, feel free to use the button below or this poster on any social media websites. (Enter the drawing by going to my friend's website: http://daliadaudelin.com/blog)


Dalia Daudelin

Interracial, Sleep Sex, Billionaire:

Dildo Bike, Exhibitionism, Public Sex:

BBW, Billionaire, BDSM, Impregnation:

Skye Eagleday

Blog  / Amazon

Sleep Sex, Virgin, Breeding:

BBW, Werewolf, Masturbation:

Pseudo Incest, Dubious Consent, Virgin:

William Cooper

M/M, Gay, Brocest, Incest:

U. R. Knickers

Dubious Consent, BDSM, Edge Play: 

Dubious Consent, Pseudo Incest, Drugging: 

Dubious Consent, Lesbian, Straight Sex, Gay Sex:

Angel Starr

Reluctant, Gay, Viking, BDSM:

Reluctant, Lactation Fetish, Humiliation:

Pandora Box

Incest, Exhibitionism, Spanking:

Kendra Blossom

Lactation:

Kitty Velvet

Lactation:

Werewolf, Erotic Romance:


Don't have a toy to use with these great stories?

How would you like a $50 Amazon gift card? You could use it to buy a vibrator, some butt plugs, or maybe some kinky bed restraints!

Remember you just have until the 4th of July when the books go back to full price! Except my Ballet Belly Bottom, which is yours for free until August 1, 2013, because hey--I like to give you guys a lot of extra helpings :)





Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Can A Gainer Be Satisfied With A "Civilian?"


Hey man, I've been following your blog for forever, and I've just got to say its fantastic. You always seem to do a great job of providing thoughtful and balanced answers to people's questions.
I've been dating a guy for 4 years who I've been living with for 2. He is head over heels in love with me, but the feeling isn't mutual. He is a great guy, but I don't love him. He doesn't know I'm a gainer and he's always trying to get me to go to the gym with him "for health reasons". I enjoy his company, we share a lot of the same views on most subjects and the sex is decent, but I just don't feel the same way about him as he does me. I know that this relationship is going to have to change sooner than later. A long sit down style talk is certainly in order. My question is if I or any gainer really, can ever be satisfied by a relationship worh someone outside of this community. (Based on your experience as a psychologist and sex researcher). This has been my only major relationship thus far, up but I find myself wishing I had just told him I was a gainer before things got more serious. I'm not saying that the reason I don't love him is because he isn't an encourager, but I can't help but wonder if that would somehow make up for the emotional gap between the two of us. I'm sure you're busy, but if you could find the time to get back to me about this I'd be really grateful.


* * * *


One of the things that struck me was a comment made by a radio psychologist several years ago. A guy had called in and expressed concern about his fiancee, and how he was worried if he was making the right decision. The (female) psychologist got a bit snarky and made the generalization men always had the attitude “Yeah, this relationship is good, but what if tomorrow I walk into the bank or a store and meet the right one?” Then she said women look at their partner and think, “I can change him.” So for her world, men hope to find “the right one,” and women hope to “modify” a partner to become “the right one.”


Based on your profile information, and the fact you stated you've doubled your weight in the past two years or so, I am reminded of Orson Welles' quote: “Gluttony is not a secret sin.” Knowing how long he's been in your life, he's literally watched you in the process of blimping. It's pretty obvious you've expanded and unlikely you're going to shrink, since you clearly don't buy his “health reasons” and gym approach. I'm pointing this out because you report he's “in love” with you during a period of time you've doubled the amount of boyfriend he can have sex with. I would therefore assume as you move forward to 300, your size is not a major issue for him and his affection. Just so, if you had sat down with him years ago, and said, “I think I'm too skinny and I'm looking forward to being a fat guy because I know it will be a turn on for me,” I don't know if you'd be in a significantly different position than you are now. As far as I can tell, the one missing piece of the “puzzle” (for him) is that there is an erotic component to your gain.


To get back to your actual question--


A) In my professional experience as a Family Therapist specializing in couples and as a sex researcher—many couples stay together even if their sexual life is not fulfilling to one or both. For some it's security—financial or otherwise. For others, there is a strong sense of companionship. Some stay together with the attitude “better the devil you know.”


B) Depending on the intensity of a gainer's eroticism around gaining, I think it is certainly possible for a gainer to partner with a “civilian” (as a non-gainer/non-encourager is often called) and have a relatively happy relationship. But this is only possible if the gainer's eroticism isn't the “major mojo” of his sexuality—or if they do what a lot of couples do—compartmentalize. Compartmentalize means they basically put their relationship into one “box” and sexual expression into a different box. This is true for a lot of “kinks.” If you are heavily into BDSM and your partner is strictly vanilla, the chances are your sex life isn't going to be great. The solution is to find a partner who does satisfy your needs, and then you come home to the spouse, who satisfies your other needs (of companionship, for example). There are certainly gainers who work with this model, where their gainer needs are met outside of their primary relationship, because for a lot of “civilians,” they're never going to “get” what's erotic about gaining, anymore than a strictly vanilla type is going to “get” BDSM. In both cases, the “civilian” is not going to “convert” to a kink that doesn't connect to him. In my experience with other gainers, they will report a partner who will attempt to “role play” being an encourager, but because they don't “get it,” the interaction is often not pleasant for the gainer and the partner won't do it on a regular basis. By the way, in my experience, it sometimes works out if one partner is an encourager and his partner gains weight, not as an erotic desire on the part of the one fattening up, but because the encourager is good at encouraging, and because of his own “kink” finds his partner sexier with every added inch, so there's a “feed back loop,” where the blimping partner often doesn't care about having to buy a larger pants size because his own sex life is ramped up by the excitement of the encourager. This then becomes a “win/win” for such a couple, and I suspect this frequently happens with heterosexual married couples. In many cultures, there is the expectation a husband will gain weight after getting married—it's a sign of adulthood, of financial success (and in a sexist culture) and proof of what a good cook the wife is. For some married women, there is also the attitude a chubby hubby is a faithful one, where outside women aren't going to try to seduce him now that he's blown up.


  1. After years of being around this community, what I hear over and over again from gainers/encouragers for whom this really is a significant part of their sexuality, a primary relationship with a “civilian” does not work in the long run. I suspect the standard pattern is the one you've been following: “I will stick in this relationship even though I'm becoming more frustrated with it the longer I stay around. But I would feel guilty/bad/ashamed/superficial if I dump my partner who is a really good person and I'm quite fond of him. But he will never sexually satisfy me.”


  1. If you were in therapy with me (and you're not) there are two standard questions I would have for you: What would happen if you ended this relationship, and What would happen if you did not end this relationship.


Based on my experience, if after two years of living together and doubling your weight, I really don't see anything that is going to change other than you continuing to gain weight. While that will be erotic for you, there's really no change I can see with your partner. One option, which you've considered is sitting down with him and “coming out” as a gainer, and how this is your major kink. You need to stress this is like your sexual orientation. It's not something you chose, but it's what you are. By the way, that's an excellent metaphor for the “civilian.” Just as your partner can't “choose to be straight” he's not really in a position to “choose to be an encourager.” I mean, you could win the lottery, and come out and discover he's really been a secret encourager all along and has really been sneaking calories for you when your back is turned, and has helped you pack on the pounds. This is what happens in gainer fiction. It isn't what tends to happen in real life. (Sadly)


Part of this is just a numbers game. First you eliminate perhaps 90% of the male population as a partner because they're straight. Then you narrow down the number of potential partners because they are too old/too young or in other “deal-breaker” categories. Then with the few that remain, you try to find the ones who are gainers/encouragers, and believe me, that number gets pretty small. The Internet has done an amazing thing, by bringing together people with the same kink, so they can support one another. One of the things I frequently hear from members of Grommr is how much they look forward to the encouragement they get on the site, because they sure aren't getting it in real life. Sites like Grommr have also done a great service by allowing guys to meet other guys into gaining/encouraging, but again, that doesn't help if you discover a great partner, but he lives in southern France while you live in Virginia. There may be members of Grommr in your area, but there's no guarantee you'll end up in a relationship with them because, trust me, if the only thing you have in common is a belly or a desire to fatten someone up, that does not lead to a long term relationship. It's also one of the reasons couples stay together. “What are the chances I'll find someone who is at least as good as the one I have now?”


E) Finally—here's what you should also consider. If you are not satisfied with your relationship, and you do nothing to alter it, you're not going to get more satisfied. Speaking as objectively as I can, staying in the relationship without trying to alter it means it's ultimately unfair to your boyfriend, who frankly deserves someone who “loves him back.” The longer you stay together, the longer he will be deprived of a partner he deserves. The longer you stay together, the longer you will be deprived of a partner who is a match for your sexuality.


By “altering” your relationship, I mean “coming out” to him as a gainer. Like coming out to your parents and family (if you have)it's critical to remember people learning to understand and accept a major aspect about you doesn't usually happen immediately. The newly informed need time to process the information and eventually make it fit into their own heads and hearts. Just so, one conversation about “What gaining means to me” doesn't mean your boyfriend will understand what you're saying the first time he hears it.


Then it comes down to negotiation. What precisely do you need from him to improve your relationship? If he were magically able to wake up tomorrow and truly satisfy you sexually, would you want to stay in the relationship? Would you want him to double his own weight? And again—this is an important metaphor. Fattening him up might be a turn on for you, but given the mention of the gym, I'm going to go out on a limb and suspect the idea of your boyfriend gaining a hundred pounds in the next couple of years is not going to thrill him.


And—let me bring this up, because it's a feeling I'm getting “between” the lines. In my professional experience, couples seek out people in my field because they either want to “fix” a relationship that is not satisfying them—or they want to end the relationship and seeing a therapist is their way of being able to say to their partner and the world--”See! We did everything possible to make this work, and the relationship just couldn't be saved.” Then they get to walk away without guilt, or without one of them being seen by family and friends as “the bad one.”


You're 23. That means you started getting involved with your boyfriend when you were 19, and you've now lived together for two years. Long and long ago, it was pretty normal for a teenager to end up marrying another teenager and figure their lives were set. And indeed, that often worked. But it's also one of the reasons why in the U.S., we still have a divorce rate of about 50% because most teenagers don't make great spouses. People change and grow (and by grow, I'm not talking about their waist). In other words, even if the gainer eroticism was not part of the equation, I don't know if this would be a long-term relationship because there may be other elements that will not ultimately satisfy you (or him).


Historically, many men did not come out as gay until they were older—at least in their 20s. One of the major changes has been gays coming out at younger and younger ages. From a therapist's point of view, this is terrific. It means the younger you are when you come out, the more opportunity you have to “practice” being a good partner. Dating is really the “training wheels” for an eventual long-term relationship. For people who aren't out, they don't get to “practice” until much later on in their lives, when they do come out, which means there are a lot of folks out there who are “damaged goods,” who need a lot of help to be able to be in a healthy same-sex relationship.


I can't help but wonder how it would have turned out for both of you if you had had the opportunity to really date without the sense of going “home” to a boyfriend. You indicate in your profile you're in an open relationship, but I would be very curious if you define “open relationship” in the same way your boyfriend would. By having a primary relationship with him for at least the last two years, it means you've both been denied an opportunity to find out what it would be like to have a relationship with a different person.


On one level, as a therapist who really believes in change, I believe it is possible for you to learn to love a partner in the way he or she loves you. But that doesn't mean I also believe that should be done, or the investment of energy and time to make the change happen would be worth it.


So in summary, let's circle back to my first statement about the radio psychologist—I get the real sense you wake up every morning in a relationship and ask yourself, “but what if the guy who would really make me happy is out there somewhere?” And it's hard to avoid the realization “as long as I stay in this unsatisfying relationship, I'm not going to have the opportunity to find the right one.” I would suggest you “come out” to him as a gainer, but spend a significant amount of time preparing for it. Be very specific and concrete about what you want him to do with this new knowledge. Do you want him to feed you? Do you want him to document your weight gain by taking photos of you and taking your measurements? Do you want him to never bring up again the idea of going to the gym? Do you want him to gain weight? And if he is unable or unwilling to respond the way you desire, do you feel it would be appropriate to either end the relationship or scale it down to “just friends?” Also-remember in negotiation, both parties are involved. Otherwise you're just ordering him to change. If he's willing to do behavior “x” for you, are you willing to do behavior “y” for him? Since this is revolving around sex, if he's willing to try something to support your kink, is there something he wants sexually from you that you've been uncomfortable about providing up until now? Would you be willing to do it in exchange for him trying to support your own kink? Are there “dealbreakers” for you that he might want in exchange for doing the things you want him to do?


I wish you both the best. In my personal and professional experience, it's rare for someone's first relationship he has at the age of 20 to be the same one he'll have when he's 30, 40, or 50. My own Significant Other just returned from spending the Memorial Day weekend in his home state, where he stayed with his first boyfriend and the boyfriend's partner. They are now both in their early 40's, but have remained in touch and close for about twenty years. If your current relationship ends in terms of being boyfriends, it's certainly possible to keep him in your social network because he obviously has a lot of valuable qualities. And who knows—this is the United States where as of 2012, two-thirds of adults are overweight or obese. Biologically, you haven't really finished your adult growth until around the age of 25 (on the average) which means someone (who doesn't have a gaining kink) that is slim at 20 may be pudgy by their mid-twenties. If you break up but keep him in your social network, it may well be in a few years he may also have a belly and can end up rejoining each other in a more satisfying relationship. That's what happened with me. He went from 155 to over 260. It's not his “kink” but he knows it's mine. Being over 100 pounds heavier is not erotic in itself for him, but his own gluttony and enjoyment means he's not doing everything in his power to lose the weight. I'm one of those fortunate folks in that “win/win” where as an encourager, I enjoy him blowing up, and he enjoys eating.



So-can a gainer/encourager have a satisfying relationship with a civilian? Definitely. Is it likely? One of my favorite quotes is—the race doesn't always go to the fastest horse—but it's where you place your bet. The hard reality is—most people, regardless of their kink, don't tend to stay forever in the relationship they found themselves in while in their early 20's.